As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

Activision Blizzard’s gender discrimination lawsuit, defined


Activision Blizzard, the developer and writer of mega franchises like World of Warcraft, Diablo, and Name of Responsibility, is in disaster. The corporate faces wide-ranging, extremely damaging allegations that it maintains a poisonous office atmosphere that’s hostile to girls, employs a disproportionately low variety of them, pays them much less, and topics them to sexual harassment, whose perpetrators should not meaningfully punished.

A two-week cycle of dangerous information and lackluster responses from the corporate has demoralized builders, notably inside Blizzard Leisure, and the gamers and followers of its video games. The corporate’s inventory worth has slid greater than 12 % because the story first broke. Two senior executives are out at Blizzard, and others who now not work for the corporate are nonetheless being referred to as to account for what occurred throughout their time there.

What’s happening? Who’s left the corporate? What does this imply for the video games they make? We’ll try and recap all the developments on this story, updating this submit as extra particulars emerge.

Who’s suing Activision Blizzard?

California’s Division of Honest Employment and Housing (DFEH) filed swimsuit in opposition to Activision Blizzard on July 20, 2021 for 10 violations of state employment regulation. This adopted a two-year DFEH investigation of the corporate’s office practices. DFEH’s report from that investigation, dated June 24, 2021, discovered that Activision Blizzard “discriminated in opposition to feminine workers in phrases and situations of employment, together with compensation, task, promotion, termination, constructive discharge, and retaliation.”

The investigation additionally discovered that Activision Blizzard’s feminine workers “have been topic to sexual harassment,” and that the corporate’s management “did not take all cheap steps to stop illegal discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.” DFEH is alleging quite a few violations of California employment regulation, citing examples way back to 2010. (This criticism is a civil lawsuit, not a felony case.)

Moreover, a shareholder filed a lawsuit in opposition to Activision Blizzard on Aug. 3 alleging that the corporate’s negligent management contributed to the cycle of dangerous press and market response, inflicting a big drop within the firm’s share worth. That swimsuit seeks class-action standing to symbolize traders who purchased Activision Blizzard shares over the previous 5 years.

Why is California suing Activision Blizzard?

It’s unknown what, particularly, induced the state to start its investigation of Activision Blizzard. In August 2020, Bloomberg reported that Blizzard workers had been anonymously sharing a spreadsheet of their salaries and raises, after many had beforehand instructed the corporate by way of survey they have been sad with their compensation. Activision Blizzard’s follow-up efforts relating to pay have been apparently unsatisfactory, resulting in the spreadsheet’s circulation.

The week after Bloomberg’s report, Dexerto reported that the federal Equal Employment Alternative Fee had contacted a number of Activision Blizzard workers, informing them that it was investigating their firm “in regard to allegations of gender-based and/or sexual harassment.” That communication requested workers to finish a questionnaire describing their employment expertise on the firm.

It’s unknown the place the EEOC’s investigation of Activision now stands.

J. Allen Brack, World of Warcraft executive producer and new president of Blizzard Entertainment

J. Allen Brack resigned as president of Blizzard Leisure on Aug. 3, 2021.
Picture: Blizzard Leisure

What components of Activision’s enterprise are alleged to be discriminatory?

Although DFEH’s swimsuit names as defendants the subsidiaries Activision Publishing and Blizzard Leisure, together with their company guardian Activision Blizzard, a lot of the criticism’s particular allegations contain Blizzard Leisure.

The lawsuit’s allegation of a “frat home” or “frat boy” tradition is directed at Blizzard Leisure. There, DFEH says, girls have been subjected to “dice crawls,” a sort of workplace occasion whereby male workers, who had been consuming, prowled the office and subjected girls to undesirable advances, lewd conduct, and different sexual harassment.

“Feminine workers working for the World of Warcraft crew famous that male workers and supervisors would hit on them, make derogatory feedback about rape, and in any other case have interaction in demeaning conduct,” the lawsuit says.

J. Allen Brack, who till this week was Blizzard Leisure’s president, allegedly knew of this and different misconduct, however he solely gave “a slap on the wrist” to the one offender named within the criticism, former World of Warcraft inventive director Alex Afrasiabi. (Afrasiabi will not be a defendant.) Brack can be stated to have been instructed in early 2019 that feminine workers have been quitting “as a consequence of sexual harassment and sexism,” however, apparently, he did nothing about that. Brack resigned from Blizzard on Aug. 3, 2021.

Blizzard stated on July 28 that it fired Afrasiabi in the summertime of 2020. Public consideration has fixated on Afrasiabi since a report in Kotaku described his conduct at previous BlizzCons, the corporate’s annual fan expo. Within the criticism and that report, Afrasiabi is alleged to have propositioned and accosted feminine co-workers on the conference, trying to kiss them in entrance of supervisors.

Kotaku’s report stated that Afrasiabi’s status for sexual harassment was so well-known that his resort room at BlizzCon was referred to as the “Cosby Suite.” A social media submit dated to 2013 confirmed Afrasiabi and different Blizzard builders gathered on a mattress with a framed image of Invoice Cosby, who in 2014 and 2015 could be accused by greater than 45 girls of rape, sexual assault, or tried assaults, resulting in a 2015 indictment and 2018 conviction.

Activision Publishing, the portion of the corporate chargeable for franchises corresponding to Name of Responsibility, is talked about by identify solely twice within the lawsuit’s factual allegations. “A feminine human sources worker at Activision Publishing was delayed and handed over for a promotion regardless of receiving constructive efficiency opinions, doing considerably extra work than her male counterpart, and taking on the precise duties of the departing individual,” the declare says.

Ladies working in Activision Publishing’s accounting division additionally instructed DFEH “that male counterparts have been paid considerably greater than them regardless of doing the identical or much less work and having much less duties.”

What’s Activision Blizzard’s official response?

When information of the DFEH lawsuit broke, the corporate instantly launched a press release to information media that stated the case was constructed on “distorted, and in lots of circumstances false, descriptions of Blizzard’s previous.”

Activision Blizzard stated DFEH additionally “rushed to file an inaccurate criticism,” relatively than “have good religion discussions with us to higher perceive and resolve any claims or issues earlier than going to litigation.” The corporate additional stated it was “sickened” by the DFEH criticism’s of an worker’s loss of life by suicide and the insinuation that it was attributable to a poisonous office atmosphere.

That was adopted by an inside observe to workers, written by Fran Townsend, the corporate’s government vice chairman and chief compliance officer. “A just lately filed lawsuit introduced a distorted and unfaithful image of our firm, together with factually inaccurate, outdated, and out of context tales — some from greater than a decade in the past,” she wrote.

Blowback from Blizzard workers was rapid. On July 26, greater than 800 signed a letter calling the corporate’s response, and particularly Townsend’s observe, “abhorrent and insulting to all that we imagine our firm ought to stand for.” Greater than 1,800 workers would co-sign the letter within the coming day, and Blizzard staff organized a walkout on the firm’s Irvine, California headquarters the following day.

That obtained the eye of Activision chief government Bobby Kotick, who on July 27 issued a press release that apologized for the corporate’s “tone deaf” response to the DFEH swimsuit. “I’m sorry that we didn’t present the best empathy and understanding,” he stated.

Kotick introduced that Activision Blizzard had employed a third-party regulation agency “to conduct a evaluate of our insurance policies and procedures,” and inspired any worker “with an expertise you imagine violates our insurance policies or in any means made you uncomfortable within the office” to contact that agency’s lead investigator.

A shot of the Sorceress in a church in Diablo 4

Blizzard’s Diablo 4, introduced at BlizzCon 2019, doesn’t have a launch window — besides it’s not popping out this yr.
Picture: Blizzard Leisure

How has this affected growth of Blizzard’s video games?

The weekend after the DFEH lawsuit was filed, a senior designer at Blizzard stated “virtually no work is being achieved on World of Warcraft proper now whereas this obscenity performs out.” The next Tuesday, the WoW growth crew posted a press release to the sport’s boards vowing “rapid motion” to make its video games and neighborhood extra inclusive and welcoming. This particularly meant eradicating two references to Afrasiabi, whose identify was the premise for a minimum of two NPCs and quite a lot of in-world objects.

On Aug. 3, Brack stepped down from his place as president of Blizzard Leisure, leaving growth executives Jen Oneal and Mike Ybarra in cost. The identical day, Jesse Meschuk, Blizzard’s head of human sources, additionally left the corporate.

Brack had been with Blizzard for 15 years, ascending to its prime job after founder and chief government Mike Morhaime left in October 2018. Earlier than then, Brack had been a frontrunner on the World of Warcraft growth crew.

Additionally on Aug. 3, Blizzard introduced that Diablo Immortal, the cellular adaptation of the motion RPG, had been delayed to 2022, previous its unique launch window for the latter half of 2021. Blizzard’s assertion on the delay didn’t reference the turmoil introduced on by California DFEH’s lawsuit, nonetheless.

The corporate’s quarterly earnings name with traders on Aug. 3 was predictably dominated by the subject of the lawsuit. Oneal, current for the dialogue, instructed an analyst that Blizzard was “doubling down on our growth recruiting as we increase the scope and imaginative and prescient of our franchises.”

She continued: “After we come collectively, we make among the finest video games within the business, and we’re now seeing that power utilized to our tradition, which is equally essential. There’s quite a lot of work forward of us. However the ardour and productiveness are already right here. And when our individuals really feel secure and supported, the remainder goes to care for itself.”


We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Reset Password
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart