Intel revealed its new roadmap for future processors this week, with new CPU households anticipated to launch yearly over the following 5 years.
It additionally revealed that it’s tweaking the naming construction for its course of nodes to be able to give clients “a extra correct view of course of nodes throughout the trade.”
As such, Intel’s third-generation 10nm course of will now be referred to as Intel 7, and Intel’s 7nm expertise will now be known as Intel 4. Such a transfer has clearly been carried out to make Intel’s processors look extra in step with the competitors.
Whereas this new branding could look deceptive on the floor, I can sympathise with Intel’s resolution. In any case, Intel chips have remained aggressive with AMD processors in recent times, regardless of seemingly having an obstacle on account of its larger processor nodes. As Intel explains, advances its 3D packaging applied sciences allow Intel to supply comparable efficiency ranges to competing chips with smaller nodes.
Pat Gelsinger, CEO of Intel, mentioned, “Nowadays the varied naming and quantity schemes used throughout the trade, together with ours, now not check with any particular measurement and don’t inform the total story of easy methods to obtain the perfect stability of energy, effectivity and efficiency.”
However with Intel deciding to rebrand its future processor nodes, it was an ideal alternative to make the branding extra comprehensible for individuals who aren’t essentially fluent with pc lingo. As an alternative, Intel arguably made its terminology much more sophisticated.
For 2021 Intel plans to launch its Intel 7 course of node. Following that there can be Intel 4 in 2022, which is able to then be succeeded by Intel 3 and Intel 20A. At first look, there’s little or no logic to the naming.
Intel hasn’t revealed the reasoning behind these names, however on additional inspection, it looks like the numbers are speculated to replicate the efficiency energy of equal rival course of nodes (ie Intel 7 will rival TSMC’s 7nm course of).
Both manner, that’s a complicated naming construction, and presents little or no helpful data to the top person. If Intel actually wished us to cease specializing in the scale of its course of node, why not provide you with a very indifferent terminology? Intel 1, Intel 2, Intel 3 and so forth would make extra sense and supply a extra coherent sample, just like how Apple markets its M1 and rumoured M2 chips.
Intel doesn’t assist issues by giving all of its Intel Core generations new code names equivalent to Tiger Lake, Rocket Lake and Alder Lake. It was particularly complicated when Intel break up its tenth Era processors into Ice Lake and Comet Lake classes. I’m undecided how that may simply be defined on the store ground of PC World.
I’m positive the likes of PC avid gamers and processor fans have a great understanding of all of Intel’s processor names, however I sympathise with these attempting to purchase a brand new laptop computer or desktop PC with simply entry-level data.
Most individuals I converse to imagine that they solely want to contemplate whether or not an Intel processor is an i3, i5 or an i7, which may lead them into spending massive on an outdated gadget.
So sure, I completely perceive why Intel has determined to rebrand its processor nodes – it is smart to distance itself from nanometers. However Intel nonetheless wants to enhance on its branding if it needs to makes its processors accessible to everybody, and never simply fans.
Ctrl+Alt+Delete is our weekly computing-focussed opinion column the place we delve deeper into the world of computer systems, laptops, parts, peripherals and extra. Discover it on Trusted Critiques each Saturday afternoon.